“We’re afraid of Obama!” yelled an onlooker at a republican town hall meeting about health care.
Another member of the crowd shouted, “We’re afraid of Obama! He’s a Socialist! We’re all afraid of Obama! You should be afraid of Obama!”
"Turn off Glenn Beck,” the speaker responded.
Sarah Palin, while too busy for politics and the Governorship of Alaska, found time to write on her facebook page, “I will not stand for Obama’s ‘death panel’ that will say whether or not they (her children and grandparents) live.”
President Obama had to rebut these rumors on his web address Monday.
“Let me start by dispelling outlandish rumors that health care reform will promote euthanasia or cut Medicaid, or bring about a government takeover of healthcare. That’s simply not true. This isn’t about putting the government in charge of your health insurance, it’s about putting you in charge of your health insurance. …it will provide for the hundreds of millions of Americans that don’t have health insurance…We’ll stop insurance companies from denying coverage due to past medical history.”
Can we all agree on something here?
It is not positive that one group lies about another so much, to the point that our President has to coddle us while explaining the real hopes and dreams of health care reform he has put forth.
But what has driven people to seemingly mindlessly insane with rage directed Obama’s way? What could have made this sector of Americans so angry?
As the famous Islamic Caliphate Ali bin Aba Talib (RA) in the seventh century said of human nature, "We Fear What We Don't Know."
So, should we be fearful, and in hand, angry about things we don’t understand, or should we seek to know as much about them as possible?
Here we come across a problem. In today’s postmodern condition, the very one we all live in currently, we have many things to get in the way of simply “knowing” things, or even “learning” things.
The postmodern condition leads to “information overload,” too much information to sort through to find what is the “truth” of the matter. It also leads to stereotyping, which, while negative many times, may not always be the case, but a way to navigate our world.
The “news” providers of 2009 basically force us into stereotyping though, through our bipolar world view, that says, “If I’m good, you’re bad,” and vice versa.
The cable news networks, like FOX News, CNN, MSNBC and others absolutely feed off this negativity, and the way they publish their “news” is through a very effective medium that can penetrate deep and in a broad way.
This “news reporting” is called propaganda.
But what exactly is propaganda?
Most people, when asked, “What is propaganda?” would answer, “Isn’t that what those WWII movies were based on?” The answer would be exactly correct, though it wasn’t the first time, nor last time propaganda has been used.
Noam Chomsky describes propaganda as coming in five “filters.” The filters are; ownership of the medium, medium’s funding sources, sourcing, flak, anti-communist ideology.
Chomsky argues that since mainstream media outlets are large corporations or part of conglomerates, the information presented to the public will be biased with respect to these interests. According to the funding “filter” the news is nothing more than a “filler” to get readers, or viewers, to see the advertisements, which make up the real content.
Chomsky continues, talking about sourcing saying, “The mass media are drawn into a symbiotic relationship with powerful sources of information by economic necessity and reciprocity of interest.” The fourth filter is flak, which is, “Negative responses to a media statement or program.” And the fifth is “anti-communism” which in today’s thinking, can be thought of as “anti-ideologies” which exploit fear and hatred of groups that pose a potential threat, either real, exaggerated, or imagined.
Where does propaganda play a role in our every day lives?
Now that I have described propaganda, in however a brief and possibly confusing way, how does it really affect us in our lives as Americans?
I will use some concrete examples to show how propaganda influences us in a real way, through the media.
FOX News’ Bill O’Reily in 2007 called Left wing demonstrators, “Nazis. Nazis used to change facts and make smear campaigns. That’s what they’re (left wingers) are doing.”
In those three brief sentences, O’Reiley is using three of the “filters” Chomsky described above; ownership, anti-ideologies, and is the quintessential example of sourcing.
FOX News is owned by Rupert Murdoch, who owns News Corporation, one of the five media conglomerates that run all of the news we have in
So, basically, there are five companies that own 80-90 percent of our media, TV, radio, and movies. The internet is the one medium that is seemingly “free,” although conglomerates are at work here too. The five companies have five main owners, and the news they provide is subject to the owners of the conglomerate.
In actuality, what is reported to the American public is news that is beneficial to the owner, not what is necessarily “news worthy.”
FOX News, and in turn many of the cable news networks, are exemplary of showing stories that should not be news worthy, and spreading propaganda.
FOX “News” Network is spreading this propaganda to a sector of the American public that eat it up and turn what they don’t know into fear. FOX News, instead of reporting real news, in a “fair and balanced” way, like that advertise, does nothing but use fear tactics about things we (the American public) do not need to worry about.
Here are just a few examples, of the hundreds I have personally heard from these “news” channels, as FOX is not the only culprit here: The Swine Flu, The Bird Flu, Anthrax, E-Coli in Tomatoes, or even terrorists in general.
Think about it, how many terrorist attacks have there been in
Sure, there was the DC sniper, Ted Kaczynski, and other random crazies out there. So, add all those up and how many do you get? A minuscule amount, especially compared to many countries in the
But what did FOX News used to harp on while W. was in office? “The
To think that way is not only illogical, it is plain wrong.
Sure, Bush changed a lot of things security-wise during his presidency, but his hand was forced, not voluntary. Not to mention domestic wire-tapping, which goes completely against the Constitution and the government used the CIA to do so, when their jurisdiction is solely outside of US borders, not inside.
Think about it all, it takes a lot of time, effort, and most of all money to make something like the 9/11 attack happen. Bin Laden (if that’s really who was behind it all) had to plan the attack all out, plant people in
Basically, they hit us in a weak place, a place that has been sored up since, but is not impenetrable. Bush though, also sold the
But this is where the argument comes full circle. There are some things we should worry about, real problems that can affect us in a real way. There are also some things that are absolutely ridiculous to spend time fretting about.
The evidence of this propaganda and use of fear tactics is shown in something that has come up repeatedly in the last three days since Sarah Palin’s facebook statement came out, “Obama and his ‘death panel’.”
Every one is in an uproar over her comments, not because of how incredibly ridiculous they are, but because some people actually believe that they are true!
The US Government setting up a “death panel” that gets to chose whether you live or die? Come on, this isn’t some SciFi story we’re reading, this is 2009, the year of change in the form of a black president.
But who could make these seemingly intelligent think such crazy things? The media of course. The media, as I learned, is pervasive, domineering, and like some people’s God, omnipresent. Think about going in public and all the media you are subjected to.
TV in public places like the bus station, or radio on the bus, or a huge ad on the side of a bus —and we’re just talking about a small sector of our society, public transportation!
A great example of this came today,
So, in summation, there are a few final points I would like to reiterate to everyone.
First, the media is everywhere in the postmodern world, and we must navigate our way though it, in a critical way. Second, some media is advertised as “news” but is in actuality really just filler of interests that helps the owner of the network. Third, propaganda, while seemingly dead, is still present in our every day world. Fourth, EVERY news network is guilty of using propaganda as a strategy, not just FOX News, although they are a prime example.
Lastly, and most importantly, do NOT believe everything you read, watch, or listen to, as it could be false, misinformation, or complete propaganda designed to lead you astray from your usual intelligent understanding of the world.
Don’t even believe me fully. Question, criticize, and comment if you think I’m wrong, and why.








